HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31426 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Om Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority has withheld payment of admitted amount sum of Rs.8,25,233/-. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no. 2 within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 10, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Om Prakash Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Seeta Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad