SMT KAVITA VYAS AND ORS v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GROUP ANR
CW/11134/2012 · 2025-03-03
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9215 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9215 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11134/2012
1. Smt. Kavita Vyas W/o Sh. Virendra Kumar, aged about 40 year, R/o Near Ganesh Temple, Ward No. 23, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
2. Smt Suraj Devi W/o Sh. Ramesh Chand Vyas, aged about 50 years, R/o Barpada, Foota Kot, Ward No. 23, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
3. Smt. Vidhya Devi Gaur W/o Sh. (late) Puran Chand Gaur, aged about 38 years, R/o In front of Stadium, Meena Colony, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
4. Smt. Kamla Bai W/o late Sh. Radheshyam, aged about 44 years, R/o. In front of PWD Office, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
5. Smt. Mamta Mehra W/o Sh. Gahesh Shankar Upadhyaya, aged about 44 years, R/o. Near Naion-ka-mandi, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
6. Mst. Bano D/o Sh. Habib Khan, aged about 40 years, R/o. Near General Hospital, Bisatioyn-ki- masjid, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
7. Smt. Manju W/o Sh. Babu Lal Chaturvedi, aged about 40 years, R/o Behind Mangilal Deevan ki Haveli, Seetabari, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
8. Smt. Saroj Sharma W/o Sh. Chagan Lal Sharma, aged about 42 years, R/o. Gomti Colony, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
9. Smt. Daya Sharma W/o Sh. Virendra Sharma, aged about 43 years, R/o. Seva Singh Ki Gali, Subji Mandi, Ward No. 14, Padam Talab, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
10. Smt. Sharda Sharma W/o Sh. Ishwar Hardeniya, aged about 40 years, R/o. Hardeniya Gali, Chatikana, Ward No. 25, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
11. Smt. Babli W/o late Sh. Narayan, aged about 38 years, R/o Navrah Mandi, Ambedaker Circle, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
12. Smt. Lata Sharma W/o Sh. Bal Krishna Sharma, aged about 44 years, R/o Kumharon ki gali, Chatikana, Ward No. 24, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
13. Smt. Indira Gurjar W/o Sh. Bhanupratap Gurjar, aged about 39 years, R/o Panday ka kuwa, Bheem Nagar, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
14. Smt. Savitri Sharma W/o Sh. Gopal Lal Sharma, aged about 50 years, R/o near Neero ki masjid, Gaja Bohra ke farsh ke upar, Chatikana, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
[2025:RJ-JP:9289] (2 of 3) [CW-11134/2012]
15. Smt. Punita Chaturvedi W/o Sh. Rajesh Chaturvedi, aged about 40 years, R/o In front of Ramdwara, Outside Wazirpurgate, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
16. Smt. Guddi Devi Bansal W/o Sh. Kallash Bhandari, aged about 39 years, R/o. Choudhari ki bagichi, near Stadium, Hindon Road, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
17.
Smt. Sudha Sharma W/o Sh. Vinod Sharma, aged about 42 years, R/o Chikana Farsh, Barpada, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
18. Smt. Laxmi Bai Soni W/o Sh. Jagdish Soni, aged about 42 years, R/o Chikana Farsh, Barpada, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
19. Smt. Indira Sharma W/o Sh. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, aged about 39 years, R/o Old Subji mandi, seva singh ki gali, padam talab, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.)
20. Smt. Urmila Rajawat W/o Sh. Narendra Singh Rajawat, aged about 39 years, R/o. Parashar Gali, Chatikana, Karauli, Distt. Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The Principal Secretary, (Group -2), Department of Medical & Health, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur cum Director of National Rural Health Mission. 2. The Mission Director, Department of Medical & Health (N.R.H.M.), Swashtya Bhawan, Jaipur. (Raj.)
3. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Karauli. (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishan Sharma For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 03/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to approach the respondent No.3 by way of filing appropriate representation for redressal of their
[2025:RJ-JP:9289] (3 of 3) [CW-11134/2012] grievances. Counsel submits that still scheme is continuing and regularly selected candidates have not been made available. Counsel submits that the petitioners are still continuing on the post, in pursuance of the order passed by the Court on
31.07.2012.
2. Counsel for the respondents have no objection if such direction is issued.
3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of, granting liberty aforesaid to the petitioners, in case, any representation is submitted by the petitioners before the respondent No.3, it is expected that the same would be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, in accordance with law.
4. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /141