110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB- 478 of 2024 Date of Decision: 26.09.2024 M/S DHARMINDER KUMAR, ENGINEER AND CONTRACTORS ….Applicant vs. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. R.K.Girdhar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The applicant through instant application under Section 11 read with Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “1996 Act”) is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. 2. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that competent authority has considered claim of the applicant and found dues to the tune of Rs. 1,64,604/-. The said amount has been transferred in the account of the applicant, thus, the instant application has rendered infructuous. 3. Mr. R.K.Girdhar, Advocate expressed his inability to controvert the aforesaid fact. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.26 04:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ARB- 478 of 2020 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the application stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 26.09.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.26 04:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document