Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9214 (HP)

JEET RAM v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/5318/2025 · 2025-05-20

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.5318 of 2025 and connected matters. Decided on: 20th May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 5318 of 2025 Jeet Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 5320 of 2025 Mela Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 5322 of 2025 Prem Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in all the petitions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred a representations dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2 for redressal of their grievances, however, the same have still not been decided by the respondent No.2/Competent Authority. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondent No.2/Competent Authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representations within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be - 3 - communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 20, 2025 R.Atal