HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10481 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i. Direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar to decide the 6C application dated 27.11.2023 filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. in Original Suit No.824 of 2023 (Md. Salman Vs. Israr and others), expeditiously, within a time bound period as may be directed by this Hon'ble Court preferably within a period of one month." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 4, 2025 S. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devesh Mishra, Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mohd. Salman .....Petitioner(s) Israr Ahamad And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad