HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13500 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Sri Shashi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5 and perused the records. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quashing the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure No.8 to the present writ petition) passed by the respondent no.4. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondent authorities to pay the arrears/salary of Headmaster-Incharge as he has performing the duty of Headmaster. (c) Issue any other writ, order or direction inn the nature as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (d) Allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the petitioner." At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the first prayer. In so far as the second prayer is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the authorities concerned to pay the arrears/salary of Headmaster-Incharge as he has performing the duty of Headmaster. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5 submits that the controversy regarding payment of the aforesaid has been settled by the Division Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priya Ranjan Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shashi Prakash Singh Ashwani Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.652 of 2024 (Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board and 2 Others vs. Tripurari Dubey and 3 Others) decided on 30.04.2025. However, he submits that in case a fresh representation is given by the petitioner individually before the respondent no.4, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4 - Basic Education Officer, Azamgarh, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, keeping in mind the directions issued in Tripurari Dubey (supra), by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 10, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 13500 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad