VIVEK JAIN v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND 2 OTHERS
NA528/34243/2025 · 2025-09-08
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92133 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 92133 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34243 of 2025 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Heard Sri Vijit Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for the CBI. The instant application has been filed with a prayer for fresh/de novo investigation in Special Case No. 3 of 2012 (CBI Vs. SP Ram and others) arising out of RC No. 2(A)/2012-CBI/SC-11 of 2012 u/s 120B, 409, 420, 468, 471 IPC and sections 13(2), 13(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act, PS CBI SC-II New Delhi, Special Case No. 10 of 2014 (CBI Vs. Naresh Kumar Gupta and others) arising out of RC No. 120 2013 A0019 of 2013, u/s 120B, 417, 465, 468, 471 IPC and section 13(2), 13(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act, PS CBI/ACB/Ghaziabad, Special Case No. 2 of 2021 (CBI Vs. Dr. R. B Lal and others) arising out of RC No. 2172011A0009 of 2011 u/s 120B, 420 IPC and Section 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, PS CBI /ACU-VI, New Delhi, Special Case No. 3 of 2021 (CBI Vs. Dr. Anil Kumr Shukla and others) arising out of RC No. 2172011A0010 of 2011 u/s 120B , 420 IPC and section 13(2), 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, PS CBI /ACU-VI, pending in the court of Special Judge (Anti Corruption) CBI, Ghaziabad.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is defect in the instant application and therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a better fresh or to avail the remedy before the appropriate forum.
3. Learned counsel for the CBI is having no objection to the same.
5. In view thereof, the instant application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
6. Office is directed to return the certified copy, if any, to the counsel for applicant after retaining the photocopy of the same on record. September 9, 2025 Ankita Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijit Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava (Sameer Jain,J.) Vivek Jain .....Applicant(s) Central Bureau Of Investigation And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad