Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9212 (RAJ)

KUBER SINGH SISODIYA SON OF SHRI LALLULAL SISODIYA v. MANNALAL MALI SON OF SHRI RADHEYSHYAM MALI

CR/78/2025 · 2025-08-20

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32704] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 78/2025 Kuber Singh Sisodiya Son Of Shri Lallulal Sisodiya, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 9, Ganesh Nagar, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Mannalal Mali Son Of Shri Radheyshyam Mali, Resident Of Teeba Wali Dhani, Village Vatika, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Gaurav Singh Son Of Shri Vishnu Singh, Resident Of 2750, Purviyo Ka Mohalla, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Mahesh Meena Son Of Shri Nenuram Meena, Resident Of Ram Nangal Puran, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj.). 4. Rajendra Kumar Choudhary Son Of Late Shri Badrinarayan Choudhary, Resident Of Badapadampura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj.). 5. Babulal Choudhary Son Of Shri Kailashchand Choudhary, Resident Of Harnath Baba Ki Dhani, Jotadwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.). 6. Sub-Registrar Sanganer, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 7. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv. with Mr. R. P. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Adv. for Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 20/08/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:32704] (2 of 2) [CR-78/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents submit that compromise has been arrived at between the parties. So, the Civil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /101