123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23922-2025 Decided On: 20.08.2025 DIMPI AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONER(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant security of service to the petitioner under the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Ordinance, 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued the case on the basis of the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Ordinance, 2024, Annexure P-3, which is no longer in existence and stands replaced by an enactment. The Act, however, has not been placed on record, nor has it been referred to. 3. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 4. Permitted to do so. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 20.08.2025 JUDGE Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No Aman Dua 2025.08.25 08:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document