APHC010101312020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6088/2020 Between: 1. E.KONDABABU, S/O.SRI E.SATYANARAYANA HINDU, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.SATYA SAI BABA MANDIR STREET TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT, A.P. 2. E.N.V.V.SATYANARAYANA, S/O.SRI E.KONDABABU HINDU, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC.DOCTOR R/O.SATYA SAI BABA MANDIR STREET TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT, A.P. 3. E.HEMA VENKATA SURESH, S/O.SRI E.KONDA BABU HINDU, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS R/O.SATYA SAI BABA MANDIR STREET TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G.DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LALAPET POLICE STATION GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5. SIVA COTTON TRADERS, REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.5-148, C/O.SRI RAJESWARI COTTON GINNING MILL NH-5, LALUPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 6. THE GOLDEN PRODUCTS COTTON SEEDS MERCHANTS, D.NO.22- 12-51, 1ST FLOOR, VURVASI STREET LALAPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP REP.BY ITS MANAGER ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioners by summoning them to their respective police stations and making them to stay in the police station at the behest of the respondents 5 and 6 without any manner of right or authority of law as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power and violative of Art.19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6088 of 2020 Dt.11.09.2025 Asr