Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9210 (ALL)

RAHI TOMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/3805/2023 · 2025-10-08

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3805 of 2023 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. No one has appeared on behalf of applicants. Counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is present. 2. Counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submits that vide order dated 14.02.2023, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The Mediation report dated 20.06.2023 discloses that mediation completed but no agreement. It is next submitted that on perusal of F.I.R., prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. The applicant no. 1 is husband of opposite party no. 2 and prosecution story is supported by injury report. 3. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. The learned Magistrate has rightly summoned the applicants in the aforesaid case. No ground for quashing the proceedings of the aforesaid case, is made out which may call for any interference by this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. October 9, 2025 Meenu Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pavan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Rana, G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Rahi Tomar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad