Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92095 (ALL)

ABHAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13244/2025 · 2025-09-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13244 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the District Inspector of Schools, Gazipur to pass appropriate order on the papers submitted by the Principal of the College for according approval to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Class IV employee in Shri Gandhi Inter College Singera, Ghazipur. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2/District Inspector of Schools, Gazipur to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner for according approval to his selection." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation which is pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the contents made in the writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Abhay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2025 Pratima WRIA No. 13244 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad