- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43749 RSA No. 111 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAGANGAIAH, DEAD BY LRS SMT. HONNAMMA, 66 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE SIDDAGANGAIAH, 2. SRI. PARAMESH, SON OF LATE SIDDAGANGAIAH 39 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDENT OF BUDIGAVI VILLAGE, C.N.DURGA HOBLI, KORTAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572129. 3. SMT. MANJULA, AGED 36 YEARS, WIFE OF BASAVARAJU AND DAUGHTER OF LATE SIDDAGANGAIAH, R/AT DOOR NO.596, NEW EXTENTION, HEGGERE, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101. 4. SMT. PUSHPALATHA, AGED 34 YEARS, WIFE OF UMESH AND DAUGHTER OF SIDDAGANGAIAH, R/AT URUKERE, SIRA ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43749 RSA No. 111 of 2020 TUMAKURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-572101. …APPELLANTS (ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. N.KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, SON OF NANJE GOWDA, 2. SMT. NANJAMMA, AGED 48 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI N.KUMAR, RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NEGALALA VILLAGE, C.N.DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572129. 3. SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA, AGED 48 YEARS, WIFE OF RENUKAPPA, BURUKANA HATTI, MADHUGIRI TOWN, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572132. 4. SRI. UMESH, AGED 44 YEARS, SON OF SHIVALINGAIAH, R/AT GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101. 5. SMT. RATHNAMMA, AGED 42 YEARS, WIFE OF BASAVARAJU, R/AT THIPPAPURA PALYA VILLAGE, CHILURU HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572216. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43749 RSA No. 111 of 2020 6. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED 69 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE DODDANANJAIAH, R/AT KANCHENAHALLY VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101. 7. SMT. NEELAMMA, 66 YEARS, WIFE OF RAJANNA, R/AT SEENAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBURU HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYKRISHNA BHAT M., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R7; R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The name of the appellants is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 24.10.2025, On that day, counsel Sri.Chandraiah., was permitted to retire from the case and the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43749 RSA No. 111 of 2020 office was directed to print the name of appellants in the cause list and the appeal was ordered to be listed on 31.10.2025. The appeal is listed today by printing the name of the appellants in the cause list. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2020. Now we are in October, 2025. The appeal is pending from five years. As already noted above, the name of appellants is called out thrice in the open Court, the appellants are absent. They have neither engaged the services of a counsel nor conducted the case as a party in person. It appears that appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications if any stands disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32