Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92069 (PNJ)

DR S.K SHARMA AND OTHERS v. DR KRISHAN KANT GUPTA AND ANOTHER

COCP/4210/2025 · 2025-09-08

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-4210-2025 and -1- COCP-4253-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) 1. COCP-4210-2025 S.K. Sharma and others ....Petitioners Versus Krishan Kant Gupta and another .....Respondents 2. COCP-4253-2025 Puran Chand Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Krishan Kant Gupta and another .....Respondents Date of Decision: - 08.09.2025 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Saurabh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amarjit Singh Virk, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.2. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This order would dispose of two contempt petitions i.e. COCP-4210-2025 and COCP-4253-2025. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that the case of all the four petitioners in both the contempt petitions has been NARESH KUMAR 2025.09.08 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement COCP-4210-2025 and -2- COCP-4253-2025 considered and a common speaking order has been passed, which is taken on record and has been marked as “Mark A”. A copy thereof has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are not satisfied with the said order and has submitted that the present contempt petitions be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, the present contempt petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. ( VIKAS BAHL ) September 08, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.09.08 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement