Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92069 (ALL)

ALKA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13212/2025 · 2025-09-03

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13212 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has assailed the transfer order dated 24.05.2025 on the ground that it is against transfer policy promulgated by the State Government itself on 06.05.2025. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that since the petitioner's transfer has been made in administrative exigency/ public interest, it would be better for the petitioner to raise his grievance in his representation before the competent authority which may of course be directed to be disposed of in accordance with law. . 4. In the given facts and circumstances this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make representation before the competent authority in the matter against the of transfer within a period of two weeks from today and if he does so, the competent authority will dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with the principle laid down in the transfer policy within a period of further six weeks. September 4, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Tripathi, Akash Sonkar, Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Alka .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad