HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13183 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Km. Ashra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prateek Kumar, Advocate for Respondents-2 to 4. 2. This is second round of litigation. Petitioner has earlier approached this Court by filing Writ-A No. 8841 of 2025 wherein following order was passed on 07.07.2025: “1. Court has encountered with many repeated writ petitions wherein petitioners are approaching this Court only for a prayer to grant them their retiral dues which are legally permissible retiral dues. Claim ought to have been considered by concerned employer at their own level and for that there is no need to approach this Court. 2. Sri M.S. Khan, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in present case also, despite petitioner got retired on 30.10.2024, he has not received his retiral dues till date, therefore, he is constrained to approach this Court with such prayer. 3. Sri Prateek Kumar, learned counsel for respondents submits that claim of petitioner will be considered in accordance with law and in case any legal impediment is found, the same will be communicated to petitioner within a short period. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prateek Kumar Ramakant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Considering aforesaid submissions and taking note of assurance given by learned counsel for respondents, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that concerned respondents will decide the application/representation filed by petitioner for his retiral dues within a short period. If the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court again on default of respondents, it will be considered strictly against dealing officers.” 3. It appears that thereafter petitioner has filed representation dated 14.07.2025 which is still pending and within a very short period, i.e., six weeks, petitioner has again approached this Court that same may be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for respondents submits that representation if so filed will be considered and decided expeditiously. 5. In the circumstances, taking note of above submission made by learned counsel for respondents, this writ petition is disposed of that representation so filed be decided expeditiously and in case of any legal impediment, the same may be communicated to petitioner within a short period. September 4, 2025 AK WRIA No. 13183 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad