Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 92050 (PNJ)

HARPREET KAUR SANDHU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/45502/2025 · 2025-08-21

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (117) HARPREET KAUR SANDHU AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. 2023 seeking direction to the official respondents not to conduct parallel enquiry on the complaint filed by 2. petitioners petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 3. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits o counsel for the petitioner August 21, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HARPREET KAUR SANDHU AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed eeking direction to the official respondents not to conduct parallel enquiry on the complaint filed by respondent After arguing for some time wishes to withdraw the present petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioners and is not a direction. August 21, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-45502-2025 Date of Decision:- 21.08.2025 HARPREET KAUR SANDHU AND OTHERS ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, eeking direction to the official respondents not to conduct parallel respondent No.3 at Patiala. arguing for some time, learned counsel for the present petition so as to enable the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion f the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the and is not a direction. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 21.08.2025 ……Petitioners espondents under Section 528 BNSS, eeking direction to the official respondents not to conduct parallel , learned counsel for the the In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion f the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the MANJU 2025.08.22 11:27 I agree to specified portions of this document