Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:9776-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 101 of 2025 1 - Natwar Beriwal S/o Late Shri Baijnath Beriwal Aged About 64 Years R/o Kotra Road, Chunnabhatta, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Madanlal Agrawal S/o Late Dhan Singh Aged About 86 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Maniram Agrawal S/o Late Dhan Singh Aged About 89 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vijay Kumar S/o Late Shriram Aged About 68 Years Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Arvind S/o Late Shriram Aged About 63 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal,
2 Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Pawan Kumar S/o Late Shriram Aged About 60 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Anup S/o Late Shriram Aged About 54 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
7 - Pawan S/o Late Shri Ganpat Singhania Aged About 66 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Smt. Savitri Devi Singhania W/o Late Prakash Aged About 63 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Prithvi S/o Late Prakash Aged About 50 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Rajendra S/o Late Fattechand Aged About 66 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 11 - Santosh S/o Late Fattechand Aged About 63 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 12 - Natwar S/o Late Fattechand Aged About 56 Years R/o Dani Para, Bus Stand Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh And Represented Through Their Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Vishnu Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
13 - Taranjeet Singh Tuteja S/o Late Shri Kesharsingh Tuteja Aged About 61 Years R/o Agroha Bhawan, Gauri Shankar Mandir Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 14 - Anand Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal Aged About 50 Years R/o In Front Of Hospital Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 15 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 16 - The Station House Officer Police Station- City Kotwali, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
27.02.2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
“10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly issue a writ in nature mandamus and directed to the respondent
4 authority to file the charge-sheet/ final report against the respondent No. 1 to 14 before the concerned count. 10.2. That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly issue a writ in nature mandamus and directed to the respondent no 16 to make a proper inquiry against the respondent No. 1 to 14 and persons involved. 10.3. That, the any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. 10.4. Cost of the petition may be granted in favour of the petitioner. 2. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the relief which has been made in the present petition is defective one as there is no mention of the date on which the FIR has been registered nor the offences or the Police Station or the District has been mentioned. 3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file a duly constituted petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty with a cost of Rs.
2000/- to be deposited in the account of Boys Observation Home, Raigarh (CG) within 7 days from today and furnish the receipt of the same before the registry of this Court. 5. Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of documents after retaining attested true copy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
(Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sagrika SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.03.03 11:54:12 +0530