Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8249 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.8249 of 2025 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6292 and 6294 of 2025 Suyambu ...Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police, Sessions Court Police Station, Trichy City. (Crime No.74 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2. Uma Sakthi Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Trichy West, Perattiyur, Trichy. ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.1428 of 2020 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy in Crime No. 74 of 2019 dated 02.02.2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC and quash the same as illegal as far as the petitioner is concerned. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8249 of 2025 For Petitioner : M/s.Kayal Vizhi P.S For R1 : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The present petition has been filed by the second accused in C.C.No. 1428 of 2020, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy, seeking to quash the charge sheet, wherein the petitioner along with other accused have been charged with the offences under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. 2. A perusal of the records reveal that the second respondent authority had seized the vehicle for the tax dues and the vehicle was parked in the Trichy West RTO office on 30.12.2018. At about 12.00 midnight, on 31.12.2018, the first accused, who is the driver of the omnibus, along with his brother, who is the second accused, have broken open the lock of the RTO Office and operated the bus and committed theft of the bus. 3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner/second accused is no way connected with the said offence and he has been falsely implicated. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8249 of 2025 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 5. It could be seen from the charge sheet, the second accused, who is the brother of the first accused, has accompanied the first accused and had helped him in moving the vehicle from the premises of the RTO Office. In such circumstances, specific overt acts are alleged as against the petitioner herein and there are no grounds to quash the charge sheet. 6. In view of the above said facts, there are no merits in this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 28.07.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8249 of 2025 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sessions Court Police Station, Trichy City. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8249 of 2025 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.8249 of 2025 28.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis