Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9204 (CHH)

SMT SUSHILA MINJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/703/2025 · 2025-02-25

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9501-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 703 of 2025 1 - Smt Sushila Minj W/o Shri Maxi Million Minj Aged About 58 Years R/o Hig-7, T.P. Nagar Phase- I Tehsil And District- Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Madhu Minj D/o Shri Maxi Million Minj Aged About 33 Years R/o Hig-7,t.P. Nagar Phase- I, Tehsil And District- Korba Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Hiramnai Ekka W/o Shri Herman Ekka Aged About 60 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deepti D/o Shri Herman Ekka Aged About 33 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Dipika Ekka W/o Shri Bhudev Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Vasu Apartment, Chakarbhata, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana, Raipur, District- Raipur 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines, District Bilaspur. 3 - Maxi Million Minj S/o M. Minj Aged About 66 Years R/o Hig-7, T.P Nagar, Phase-I, Tehsil And District- Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - Gregory Tigga S/o Thosam Tipu Tigga Aged About 57 Years R/o House No. 315, Abhishek Vihar Phase-I, Mangla Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.02.25 18:12:48 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 25.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. B.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayers :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and in exercise thereof admit the petitioner and after hearing the parties in the matter, be pleased to set aside/quash the First Information Report dated 10/01/2025 having Crime no. 40/25 registered at Civil Lime Police Station, Bilaspur (Annexure P-1) and be please to quash the final report and set aside order dated 27.1.2025 of learned Court in Criminal Case no. 408/2025 on such terms as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the First Information Report without mentioning the particulars of the offences under which it has been registered and further prayed for quashing of the final report without mentioning the 3 particulars of the Court concerned where the same has been submitted, which goes to show that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioners is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the prayer is defective one. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the same shall be transmitted to the Government School for Visual and Hearing Impaired, Tifra, District - Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra