Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2955 of 2024
Date of Decision: 10.3.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Rakesh Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Ratatn, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 21.3.2024 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 10.1.2020, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2411 of 2019 titled Jagdish Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., in a time bound manner.
2.
Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states
- 2 - that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
3.
Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner in light of Jagdish Chand (supra) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if she still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
March 10, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge