- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27623 RPFC No. 60 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.60 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KOUSALYA W/O CHUNCHANAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. ANNIGANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 128. 2. KUM. BHOOMIKA D/O. CHUNCHANAGIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS R/O ANNIGANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 128 SINCE MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E. MOTHER/ PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. KOUSALYA. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R B DESHPANDE & SRI P.B. UMESH, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. CHUNCHANAGIRIGOWDA S/O RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURIST R/O. ANNIGANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573 128. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27623 RPFC No. 60 of 2021 THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.03.2021 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT HASSAN IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.63/2016 AND ALLOW THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C., AS PRAYED FOR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present revision petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in Crl.Misc.No.63/2016 dated 20.03.2021 by the Principal Judge, I Additional Family Court, Hassan, whereby the Criminal Miscellaneous filed by the petitioner/wife and the daughter was dismissed. 2. The respondent/husband has denied the relationship. The court below had dismissed the petition on the ground that the wife did not establish the relationship between the parties. In support of her evidence, the wife has produced the photos which were marked as Exs.P1 and P8 and except that, no other evidence was placed before the court and no oral evidence was adduced. Considering all these factors, the Family Court had dismissed the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27623 RPFC No. 60 of 2021 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued in line with the arguments advanced before the court below. 4. This Court has perused the impugned order and the court below considering the fact that the wife failed to establish the relationship rightly dismissed the petition. In the considered opinion of this Court, the order passed by the court below is a reasoned order. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. All pending I.As., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10