Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91994 (KAR)

KARIYAPPA v. K T DASAPPA

WP/7177/2025 · 2025-12-15

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53178 WP No. 7177 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 7177 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: KARIYAPPA S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT MADALU VILLAGE KANAKATTE HOBLI ARASIKEER TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRUTHI S P., ADVOCATE) AND: K T DASAPPA S/O LATE THIMMAIAH (SINCE DEAD BY LRS) 1. RANGAMMA W/O LATE K.T DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. HONNAIAH S/O LATE K.T DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE K.T DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 4. NAGARAJU S/O LATE K.T DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53178 WP No. 7177 of 2025 RESPONDENT 1 TO 4 RESIDING AT KERESORAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, HULIYAR HOBLI CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT- 577 226 5. JAYAMMA W/O LATE RAMESH D/O LATE K.T DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS BALLEKATTE VILLAGE HULIYAR HOBLI C.N HALLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 226 6. THIMMAIAH S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS MADALU VILLAGE KANAKATTE HOBLI ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 201 …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 31.01.2025 (ANNX-F) PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI ON IA-10 IN OS NO. 83/2019. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53178 WP No. 7177 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition on the ground that the matter before the trial Court is already settled between the parties and the suit is disposed of. 2. In view of the said submission, nothing further survives in this matter. Accordingly, the memo is accepted. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15