Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9199 (ORI)

SK RAJIT @ SK RAJI v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/316/2025 · 2025-01-31

S K Sahoo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.316 of 2025 Sk. Rajit @ Sk. Raji …. Petitioner Mr. Prakash Chandra Dash, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr. Debasish Nayak, Addl. Govt. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 31.01.2025 01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under section 482 of B.N.S.S. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Kendrapara Sadar P.S. Case No.392 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1373 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Kendrapara for alleged commission of offences under sections 305/331(2)/331(4) of B.N.S. Perused the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the petitioner has supplied the bail order copy of the co-accused in ABLAPL p. 2 No.11389 of 2024, which is taken on record. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the petitioner’s involvement is based on the confessional statement of the co-accused before police and similarly situated co- accused, namely, Sk. Abdol @ Gulam Hosen has been directed to be released on bail vide order dated 18.10.2024 in ABLAPL No.11389 of 2024 and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer. Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. p. 3 The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( S.K. Sahoo) Judge Sipun