DASARI NAGA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/5357/2025 · 2025-03-05
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9197 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9197 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010101262025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5357/2025 Between: Dasari Naga Venkata Satyanarayana ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:5357/2025
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief:
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in not deciding the Application No. TTA012400124226 Submitted by the petitioner through the Integrated Service Delivery Gateway Mee Seva on 03.12.2024 for deletion of petitioner landed property of Ac.4.58 Cents in Sy.No.606 situated at Tadikalapudi Revenue Village in Kamavarapukota Mandal of Eluru erstwhile West Godavari District and continuing the said Survey Number in the list of properties Prohibited for Registration being maintained by the Respondents as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of the provisions of Registration Act, 1908 and Offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to delete his said land from the list of properties prohibited for Registration being maintained by the Respondents under Sec 22-A of Registration Act, 1908 and pass such other
order or orders….”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.
3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the
respondent to dispose of the application dated 03.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner seeking for deletion of petitioner’s subject property from the list of properties prohibited for registration.
4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 03.12.2024 pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time.
5. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the application 03.12.2024, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction.
6. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the application dated 03.12.2024, after providing opportunity of hearing to both the parties, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
1 2019 (8) SCALE 544
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 05.03.2025 BSP
43
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.5357 of 2025
05.03.2025 BSP