MUSHTAQ AHMAD WANI AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT)
RP/70/2024 · 2025-05-16
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, Rajnesh Oswal
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9196 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9196 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No.02 Supplementary List.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through virtual Mode) RP No. 27/2024 c/w WP ( C ) No. 2388/2023 WP ( C ) No. 3066/2023 RP No. 31/2024 Gousia Jan & Ors. …Applicant(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Saqib Amin Parray, Advocate. Vs. UT of J&K & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate. Mr. Faheem Nissar Shah, GA. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
O R D E R 23.05.2024 CM No. 4174/2024 in RP No. 31/2024.
This is an application filed by the applicant(s) seeking condonation of delay in filing the review application for reviewing the order dated 15th May, 2024. Report of the Registry reveals that there is a delay of 33 days in filing the review application. Another petition bearing RP No. 27/2024 is also pending adjudication against the same order. In this view of the matter, we deem it proper to condone the delay of 33 days in filing RP No. 31/2024. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. CM No. 4174/2024, is disposed of. The review petition is taken on board. Last and final opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the respondents to file their response positively by next date of hearing and it is made clear that if for any reason response is not filed, matter shall be considered on merits. List on 5th June, 2025.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) (RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 23.05.2025
“Abdul Rashid”