Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9195 (JHR)

MANU YADAV ALIAS PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2829/2025 · 2025-04-09

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10922 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2829 of 2025 Manu Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav, aged about 25 years, son of late Birendra Yadav, resident of village- Saharbeda, Sampda, P.O. and P.S.- Gamharia, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 2848 of 2025 1. Manjit Kumar Yadav @ Chela Yadav @ Manjit Kumar Singh, aged about 20 years, son of Ram Sundar Singh, resident of village- Saharbera, Sampda, P.O.- Burudih, P.S.- Gamaria, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan 2. Sanjay Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Arun Yadav, resident of village- Saharbera, Sampda, P.O.- Burudih, P.S.- Gamaria, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan … Petitioners - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P. : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. --- 02/09.04.2025 Both these Bail Applications arise out of same police case. Accordingly, both these Bail Application are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 441 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2), 109/3(5) of the B.N.S. and later on, Section 103 of the B.N.S. has been added., pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. On 08.12.2024 at about 10:45 A.M., the father of the informant was assaulted by several persons near Sapra, Adityapur, on the pretext that he was a thief. Father of the informant succumbed to his injuries. It appears from the statement of the informant that he came to know from the local people that these petitioners were also involved in assaulting the father of the informant. -2- From the impugned order, it appears that petitioners had confessed their guilt. In view of the nature of allegation, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella, in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 441 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-