Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91939 (KAR)

PALAKSHAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14377/2024 · 2025-09-11

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS & MRS. JAYASHREE KRISHNAMURTHY, MEMBER W.P. No.14377/2024 (Lok Adalat No.6873/2025) BETWEEN: PALAKSHAPPA S/O OBALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O KITTADAHALLI, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 201. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI S.V. PRAKASH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, 2 BENGALURU-560001. 2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA-577201. 3 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAGARA SUB-DIVISION, SAGARA CITY-577401. 4 . THE TAHSILDAR SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIKARIPURA-577427 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, A.G.A.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS COMMANDING THE R-4 TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DTD 14.06.2022 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO. 31436/2014 FORTHWITH PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F AS PER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD 18.11.2022 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G1 TO THE WP. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for consideration of the representation of the petitioner dated 18.11.2022 as per Annexure-G1 for effecting change of revenue entries in the name of the petitioner in respect of Sy.No.76 measuring 2 acres situated at Dindadahalli Village, Hosur Hobli, Shikaripura Taluk, Shivamogga District. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that since the order of cancellation of the grant has been set aside at the hands of the Deputy Commissioner in the second appeal, the name of the petitioner will be restored in the revenue records. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and learned Counsel for the petitioner submitting that the 4 petitioner will be satisfied if such action is taken, the matter stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER rv/- CT:BHK