HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30817 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Petitioner claims that he was allotted the land way back in the year 1986 after the approval was granted. Proceeding for cancellation was initiated and the allotment so made was cancelled. However, in revision, the cancellation order was set aside and revision was allowed. 2. Petitioner claims that now fresh proceedings for cancellation have been initiated and by an ex-parte order, the lease so granted 40 years back has been cancelled. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that petitioner has remedy of filing revision under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. In case, revision is filed within 15 days from today, the revisional authority shall not go into question of limitation and shall decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, after considering the allotment made in favour of petitioner way back in the year 1986. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Asthana, Sandeep Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Buddhadev Giri .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad