Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91934 (ALL)

RAMAKANT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/30758/2025 · 2025-09-03

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30758 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to restrain the private respondent no. 5 to 9 from doing illegal encroachment upon the Arazi No. 347, Bhumidhari Land of the petitioner and also restraining the private respondents from raising constructions over the Arazi No. 348 (endorsed as Chak Marg/and as a land of Shreni 6-2) till the final disposal of the case no. T202415090312117, under section 24 of U.P. Revenue code 2006 pending before the respondent no. 3. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to decide the petitioner's representation dated 22.08.2025 within some stipulated period of time, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper of the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that demarcation proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration. Once the case under Section 24 of the Code, 2006 is pending, the relief as prayed in the writ petition cannot be granted. 3. However, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of directing the revenue authorities to conclude the proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Singh, Yash Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramakant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 4, 2025 V.S.Singh WRIC No. 30758 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad