Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91931 (ALL)

RAMNARESH AND 30 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13348/2025 · 2025-09-08

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13348 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Pranesh Dutt Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent-B.S.A. as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2 to pass an appropriate order upon the pending online transfer application of the petitioners which they opted within set time schedule and a further prayer to direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to transfer the petitioners to the district of their preferences as opted by them in their respective online transfer application, strictly in accordance with the Government order dated 23.05.2025, 05.06.2025 and 16.06.2025, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners who are 31 in number were appointed as Assistant Teacher/Head Master in various Primary Schools in District- Kushinagar and applications have been given by the petitioners for considering their inter district transfer at Primary Schools at different districts of their preference out of 15 districts having vacancies on the said post but the applications have not been considered till date. Learned counsel for respondent-B.S.A. as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State submit that they have no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievances, the same shall be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranesh Dutt Tripathi Ramnaresh And 30 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2- Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 9, 2025 Kalp Nath Singh WRIA No. 13348 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad