Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9193 (GAU)

MOIN UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM,

I.A.(Crl.)/256/2025 · 2025-04-20

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010024512025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/256/2025 MOIN UDDIN S/O LATE ISHAK ALI RESIDENT OF KHUDRAKANDI KARIMGANJ SRIBHUMI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR JAHURUL ISLAM Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : AB 282/2025 Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER 21.04.2025 Heard Mr. J Islam, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. H R A Choudhury, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. R Deka, learned counsel for the opposite party/accused petitioner in the connected AB No. 282/2025. 2. Also heard Mr. B Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State. 3. It is submitted by Mr. J Islam, learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the complainant/informant of Karimganj Police Station Case No. 42/2025 that has been registered against the opposite party/accused petitioner in the connected AB No. 282/2025. 4. As such, he has filed this application for his impleadment as opposite party No. 2 in the connected AB No. 282/2025 preferred by the accused petitioner. 5. Mr. B Sharma, learned APP, Assam appearing for the State has submitted that case diary of Karimganj P.S. Case No. 42/2025 has not yet been received that was called for by order dated 12.02.2025. 6. Considering the submission of Mr. J Islam, learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant be impleaded as opposite party No. 2 in the connected AB No. 282/2025 presently pending before this Court for adjudication, being the complainant/informant of said Karimganj P.S. Case No. 42/2025. 7. Registry shall accordingly correct the cause title of the connected AB No. 282/2025 and shall reflect the name of Mr. J Islam, learned counsel for the newly impleaded opposite party No. 2 in the connected AB No. 282/2025. 8. However, the complainant/informant/opposite party No.2 shall only assist the learned Additional Public Prosecutor while considering the connected AB No. 282/2025 preferred by the accused petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 9. With the above observation and direction, this Interlocutory Application, stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant