SATYAPAL v. STATE THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13187/2025 · 2025-09-03
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91925 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91925 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13187 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Shashi Bhushan Rai, learned counsel for petitioner.
2. Prayer No. ‘a’ in writ petition is self contradictory, therefore, the relief sought in said prayer cannot be granted. It appears that writ petition is drafted carelessly.
3. However, ignoring the said defect, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty to file a fresh with proper prayer. September 4, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyanshu Dwivedi, Shashi Bhushan Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Satyapal .....Petitioner(s) State Through Its Principal Secretary And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad