Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91911 (KAR)

SRI S VENKATESH v. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/26357/2025 · 2025-09-15

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36615 WP No. 26357 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 26357 OF 2025 (GM-PP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE A SHAMANNA R/AT NO. 2187, SY.NO. 223/1 KODIHALLI VILLAGE, HAL II STAGE, BANGALORE 560008 2. SRI. RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE A SHAMANNA R/AT NO. 2187, SY.NO. 223/1 KODIHALLI VILLAGE, HAL II STAGE, BANGALORE 560008 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAY KRISHNA BHAT. M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36615 WP No. 26357 of 2025 BANGALORE 560020 2. THE SECRETARY AND THE COMPENTENT OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 21.08.2025 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CH:25) IN M.A.NO.22/2025 TO THE EXTENT OF REFUSING TO GRANT INTERIM PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONER AS PRAYED IN I.A.NO.1 (ANNX-Q) AS PER ANNX-A; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONER FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TILL THE DISPOSAL OF MA NO. 22/2025 PENDING CONSIDERATION BEFORE THE LEARNED III ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36615 WP No. 26357 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER Mr. Vijay Krishna Bhat M, the learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo which reads as under, "The petitioners submits that under the facts and circumstance of the case they seek leave of the Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition as they intend to pursue the matter before the trial Court. Therefore, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn, in the ends of justice and equity." The petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners, subject to all just exceptions. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB