Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91910 (ALL)

BARAMDEEN AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/31069/2025 · 2025-09-08

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31069 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that order impugned is a revisable order. 2. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some time may be granted for filing revision. 4.In view of said fact, in case, revision is filed within 15 days from today, the revisional authority shall not go into question of limitation and shall decide the same, strictly in accordance with law. September 9, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Mishra, Dheeraj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Baramdeen And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad