CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH CMA No. 1524 of 2025 R.Shanthi Wife of Ragunath, 4/50, Anna Street, T.M.Poondi, Tirupur. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. P.Kannan Son of Dhandapani, 96/171, Itteri Road, Kumaranandapuram, Pitcham Palayam, Tirupur. 2. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by B/M., 1st Floor, Gobal Rao Library Building, Town Hall Road, Kumbakonam- 612 001. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award dated 16.04.2024 made in MCOP.No.739 of 2015 on the file of Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Tiruppur. For Appellant(s): Mr.M.LOKESH for M/S. MA.P.THANGAVEL For Respondent(s): Mrs. R. SREEVIDHYA FOR R2 R1-NO SUCH ADDRESSEE https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 6 JUDGMENT This appeal has been filed by the claimant challenging the award passed by the Presiding officer, Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tirupur, on the file of the Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.739 of 2015 dated 16.04.2024. 2. The appellant is the claimant. The case of the claimant is that on 03.04.2015, at about 21.30 hours, the claimant was standing in front of Chettinadu Hotal, on Sannadhi Street, Thirumuruganpoondi, and at that point of time, the offending vehicle which belongs to the first respondent was driven in a rash and negligent manner from West to East, without holding a valid driving license and it hit against the claimant, as a result of which the claimant sustained grievous injuries and was treated at Revathi Hospital, Tirupur and PSG Hospital, Coimbatore. An FIR came to be registered in Crime No.351 of 2015. It is under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal. 3. The Tribunal, on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 6 the part of the drive of the offending vehicle of the first respondent. 4. Having rendered such finding, the Tribunal fixed the total compensation at Rs.1,88,188/- under the following heads: Sl. No. Head Amount 1. Compensation for grievous injuries Rs.50,000/- 2. Loss of Income Rs.27,000/- 3. Expenses towards transportation and attender charges Rs.15,000/- 4. Expenses towards extra nourishment Rs.20,000/- 5. Damages towards her clothes and articles Rs.5,000/- 6. Pain and Suffering and Loss of amenities (Rs.25,000/- + Rs.25,000/-) Rs.50,000/- 7. Medical bills Rs.21,188/- Total Award amount Rs.1,88,188/- 5. The above compensation was directed to be paid along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. However, considering the fact that the driver of the offending vehicle did not posses a valid driving license, the first respondent was directed to pay the compensation. 6. The claimant has filed the present appeal mainly on the ground that the first respondent's driver did not posses a valid driving license and therefore, pay and recover should have been ordered to the Insurance Company. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 6 7. This Court carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and also the award passed by the Tribunal. 8. The ground that was taken by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is to the effect that the Tribunal should have ordered for pay and recover. The said ground is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in a batch of appeals in C.M.A.(MD).No.517 of 2025 etc, dated 01.06.2026. This Court is of the view that the Tribunal ought to have applied the principle of pay and recover. Consequently, the award passed by the Tribunal directing the first respondent to pay the compensation amount to the claimant is liable to be interfered by this Court. 9. Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, this Court finds that the Tribunal has granted a just and reasonable compensation and it does not require the interference of this Court. 10. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands disposed of. There shall be a direction to the second respondent / Insurance Company to deposit the entire compensation amount along with interest to the credit of M.C.O.P No.739 of 2015, on the file of the Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tirupur, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 6 copy of this judgment. On such payment, the amount can be recovered from the owner of the vehicle namely the first respondent by directly filing an Execution Petition. On such deposit, the claimant will be entitled to withdraw the same. No costs. 23-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SSI To: 1. The Presiding Officer, Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tirupur. 2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1524 of 2025 __________ Page6 of 6 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. SSI CMA No. 1524 of 2025 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis