HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4385 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. At present petitioner has only challenged the consequential recovery without raising any challenge to the adjudication order. 2. Sri Vineet Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vinay KUmar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file proper petition. 3. Sri Arvind Mishra, learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. October 9, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Anand Tiles And Sanitary .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad