- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40897 MSA No. 20 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: 1. SUSHEELAMMA, W/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. RAMESH, S/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. KUMARA, S/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 4. PRAKASH, S/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 5. NAGARATHNA, W/O LATE VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT GUNDASHETTYHALLI, VILLAGE DODDAGADVALLI POST, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK-573 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHARADAMBA A R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court Of Karnatka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40897 MSA No. 20 of 2024 AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, H R P 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR, HASSAN - 573 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA) THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.03.2019 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.208/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.08.2005 PASSED IN LAC.146/2000 ON THE FILE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN)., HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE FILED UNDER 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants prays for time to comply with the office objections. Appeal is of the year 2024. The office has raised 7 objections and the same are not complied even though the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for seventh time. The order sheet dated 5.12.2024 reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40897 MSA No. 20 of 2024 "Finally, two weeks' time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which, the appeal would stand dismissed." Inspite of the same, there is no compliance of the office objections. Even when the matter was listed before the Registrar P&H on 04.09.2025, there was no representation. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default i.e., for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE AKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33