HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30503 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Vikas Sahai, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Ramu Pajpai @ Ravendra Kumar @ Ravindra, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 192 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 394, 412, 504, 506, 353, 332, 333, 396, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 CLA Act as well as Section 3/4 Explosive Substances Act, Police Station- Chaubepur, District- Kanpur Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 29.08.2020. It is submitted that similarly placed co-accused, Shyamu Bajpai has already been enlarged on bail of by the Bench of this Court by order dated 09.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 21918 of 2025, copy of the bail order produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Shyamu Bajpai, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Pal, Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Sushmita Raghav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramu Bajpai Alias Ravendra Kumar Alias Ravindra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 5. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant, Ramu Bajpai @ Ravendra Kumar @ Ravindra involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 12, 2025 v.k.updh. BAIL No. 30503 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad