Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91860 (PNJ)

GURJEET SINGH AND ANR. v. MUKHTIAR SINGH AND ORS.

RSA/4384/2017 · 2025-01-21

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-48-C-2025 IN/AND RSA-4384-2017 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (108) CM-48-C-2025 IN/AND RSA-4384-2017 (O&M) Date of decision:- 21.01.2025 Gurjeet Singh and another …Appellants Versus Mukhtiar Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Janak Singh Bhinder, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Rajnikant Upadhay, Advocate (through VC) for respondent No.1. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) CM-48-C-2025 For the reasons given in the application, the date of hearing of the main case and the misc. applications, is preponed to today, and they are ordered to be taken on Board. RSA-4384-2017 (O&M) 1. Appellants are in second appeal before this Court assailing the concurrent finding recorded by both the Courts below. 2. Counsel for the appellants submits that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties by way of Panchayati Compromise dated 23.03.2024, Annexure A-1. PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.01.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CM-48-C-2025 IN/AND RSA-4384-2017 (O&M) -2- 3. Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the plaintiff has filed his affidavit dated 14.08.2024, admitting the compromise. 4. In view of consensus arrived at between the parties, the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below, are modified in terms of the Panchayati Compromise, Annexure A-1. 5. Appeal is disposed off. 6. Pending applications are also disposed off. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 21.01.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.01.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.