Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9184 (PAT)

Hiranand Bosak Chopal @ Hiranand v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./1765/2025 · 2025-02-15

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1765 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2024 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Hiranand Bosak Chopal @ Hiranand Son of Shri Daya Nand Bosak Chaupal @ Daya Nand Bosak Chaupal Village -Ward No 1 Kuchha Sikti Police Station- Sikty District -Araria Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Diksha Kumari, Advocate Mr.Alok Abhinav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 172 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the NDPS Act. 3. As per allegation, two persons who were going on a motorcycle were arrested by the police. A packet of tobacoo (khaini) and two mobile phones were recovered from the possession of the driver (the petitioner) and so far as co-accused Samiruddin (pillion rider) is concerned, 100 grams of smack like brown color substance was recovered from his possession. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1765 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case and was not aware as to what was carried by the pillion rider. No narcotic substance was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is a person of clean antecedent. He is in custody since 12.11.2024. 5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two surities of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Araria in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No. 172 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T