Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9181 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA S/O MADANLAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3031/2025 · 2025-03-03

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9003] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. IInd Bail Application No. 3031/2025 Mahendra S/o Madanlal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Guradi, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra, District Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 03/03/2025 The second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.543/2023 registered at Police Station Chhabra, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/15 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the alleged contraband recovered is less than commercial quantity in the present case. [2025:RJ-JP:9003] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3031/2025] Learned counsel further submits that the accused- petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Mahendra S/o Madanlal Meena shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J GAURAV SHARMA /08