Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91807 (ALL)

VINOD KANT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/31715/2025 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31715 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 9, 2025 NS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Vinod Kant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad