Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9180 (UTT)

CHANDA RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/334/2020 · 2025-07-14

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6077-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/334/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Nalin Saun, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Tarun Mohan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 4. Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 5. Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 6. In view of the statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.07.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da8 2a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643A F56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.07.15 10:06:04 +05'30'