HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31152 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 and Sri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents No.3 & 4. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not mutating the name of the petitioner over the house No.220-A, Talab Naval Rai, District Prayagraj. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.4-Office In-charge, Zonal Office, Zone-4, Allahapur, Nagar Nigam, Prayagraj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same after hearing all legal heirs in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 9, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Mishra, Kamla Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harshit Pandey (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Kamla Kant Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad