Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91790 (KAR)

RAMESH NAIK L v. STATE POLICE COMPLIANT AUTHORITY

WP/12112/2022 · 2025-11-10

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45931 WP No. 12112 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.12112 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. RAMESH NAIK L S/O LATE LAKSHMAN NAIK R., AGED AOBUT 40 YEARS, KADARANAHALLI THANDYA, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT 572140, ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH NAIK L. - PARTY IN PERSON) AND: 1. STATE POLICE COMPLIANT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ROOM NO 36, GROUND FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560001. EMAILID spcablr@karnataka.gov.in PHONE NUMBER 080-22034207/22034220. 2. SRI RAHUL KUMAR SHAHAPURWAD SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (SP) TUMKUR DISTRICT, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45931 WP No. 12112 of 2022 S P OFFICE ASHOK NAGAR B H ROAD TUMKUR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT /ORDER TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO REGISTER THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONER (ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-D) AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent No.1 to register the complaint filed by the petitioner at Annexure-D, against the respondent No.2. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45931 WP No. 12112 of 2022 3. Heard the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that Crime No.47/2022 of Kyatsandra Police Station is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 352, 431, 432, 504, 506, 34 of indian penal code read with Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(z) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, wherein the complaint is lodged by the petitioner herein and the matter is pending consideration before the competent Court, I am of the view that, issuing direction as prayed for in the writ petition cannot be accepted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39