IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 249-A CRM-M-53911-2022 Date of decision : 31.07.2025 Akshay Narula ….Petitioner V/S State of Punjab and another ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. B.K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Jindal, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Arshit Goel, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate for respondents No.2. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.323 dated 07.11.2021 registered under Sections 406 & 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that since the matter has been compromised between the parties and they have filed separate petition bearing No.CRM-M-5713-2025 seeking quashing of FIR in question on the basis of compromise in which statements of the parties have already been recorded before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court with regard to the compromise, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having become infructuous. 31.07.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2025.07.31 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document