Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91769 (ALL)

PAWAN CHANDRA PRAKASH v. State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLA/8688/2024 · 2025-09-08

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8688 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present criminal appeal has been filed with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 22.07.2024 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Prayagraj in Misc. Case No. 302 of 2023 (Pavan Chandra Prkash Vs. Aseem Chatterji and another arising out of application filed under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Kareili, District Prayagraj. 3. From the perusal of the records, it transpires that in the present case the complaint has been lodged through under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. As per the statement of the witnesses, it is no injury case, therefore, the offence under section SC/ST Act is made out against the appellant. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced on behalf of the parties and perused the impugned order passed by the court below. I find no irregularity, illegality or jurisdictional error in the order impugned. The appeal lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. September 9, 2025 RPD Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Sunil Kumar Pandey, Tarkeshwar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Purushottam Mani Tripathi (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Pawan Chandra Prakash .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad