Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91759 (KAR)

SRI MALLIKARJUNACHARI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4905/2023 · 2025-07-16

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27073 WP No. 4905 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 4905 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MALLIKARJUNACHARI, S/O LATE SHANKARACHARI N, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SMT. KAVITHA M, D/O MALLIKARJUNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 3. SRI. RAJASHEKAR M, S/O MALLIKARJUNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 4. SMT. MAMATHA, D/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 5. SMT. SHASHIKALA, D/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 6. SRI. SURESH, D/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT RAJAPPA LAYOUT, NEAR K.G.N. SCHOOL, BEHIND NNT ROAD, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27073 WP No. 4905 of 2023 CHINTAMANI NAGAR, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 563 125. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR C ANGADI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHASILDAR, CHINTAMANI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 563 125. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA – 563 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH K.,HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER A REPRESENTATION DATED 26/08/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE - G GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27073 WP No. 4905 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner herein is seeking direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 26.08.2022 (Annexure-G). 3. Having taken note of the averments made in the representation at Annexure-G, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the same within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54