Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 9175 (RAJ)
SANGEETA DEVI W/O SATYANARAYAN v. RADHEYSHYAM S/O KAJODRAM DHOLI
CMA/661/2022 · 2025-08-13
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31580] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 661/2022
1. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
2. Neelam Kumari Chouhan D/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 15 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
3. Akshay Singh Chouhan S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 13 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
4. Anjata Kumari D/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 10 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
5. Navya Kumari D/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 11 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
6. Sandhya Kumari D/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 6 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
7. Hukum Singh S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 5 Years, Minor Through Its Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sangeeta Devi W/o Satyanarayan, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
8. Laddevi W/o Gopal Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.)
9. Gopal Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 73 Years, R/o
[2025:RJ-JP:31580] (2 of 4) [CMA-661/2022] Munshipura, Dhuvala, Police Station Hanuman Nagar, District Bhilwara (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus
1. Radheyshyam S/o Kajodram Dholi, R/o Kumharo Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 8 Devli, District Tonk (Raj.)
2. Rakesh S/o Ram Narayan, R/o Mundghasa, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi (Raj.)
3. Govind S/o Shri Jagdish Sain, R/o Gothda, Bundi, District Tonk (Raj.)
4. National Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Avinash Dhanju, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Bhati, Adv. HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 13/08/2025 vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj;ku nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Vksad }kjk Dyse vkosnu la[;k 216@2019 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 27-10-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku ds ifr@firk@iq= e`rd lR;ukjk;.k dh okgu nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i dqy 12]38]920@& #i;s dk vokMZ e; 7-5 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k] ftlesa c<ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq ;g vihy is'k dh x;h gSA okgu Lokeh pkyd vFkok chek dEiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dk ;g fuosnu gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ysfdu vf/kdj.k }kjk 30 fnu dh vk; tksM+us ds ctk; 26 fnu ds vk/kkj ij izfrdj dh x.kuk dh xbZ gS rFkk ijEijkxr 'kh"kZd ds en esa Hkh jkf'k
[2025:RJ-JP:31580] (3 of 4) [CMA-661/2022] vi;kZIr gksuk crkrs gq, dqy izfrdj jkf'k ;Fkksfpr :i ls c<+k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh }kjk v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dks fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq;s vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA U;kf;d n`"Vkar ¼2018½ 1 ,llhlh 746 y{eh/kj uk;d cuke tqxy fd'kksj] ¼2008½ 12 ,llhlh 165 y{eh nsoh o vU; cuke eksgEen rckj o vU; ,oa 2022 ¼3½ Mh,uts 1160 yhykjke cuke ns'kjkt ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd izfrdj dh x.kuk djrs le; 26 fnu dh U;wure etnwjh ds LFkku ij 30 fnu dh etnwjh jkf'k dks fopkj esa fy;k tkuk visf{kr gSA pwafd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rd dks v)Zdq'ky ekurs gq, mldh vk;q 36&40 o"kZ fu/kkZfjr dh gS ,oa e`rd ds thfor jgus ij Lo;a ds O;fDrxr [kpsZ ds :i esa 1@5 fgLlk jkf'k dVkSrh fd;k tkuk mfpr gS] rnuqlkj rRle; v)Zdq'ky Jfed dh etnwjh nj ds vuqlkj 30 fnu dh etnwjh jkf'k ds fglkc ls izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh tkos] rks vk; dh gkfu 223x30x12x15x4@5= 9]63]360@& #i;s gksrh gS ftl ij Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk ds en esa 40 izfr'kr jkf'k 3]85]344@& :i;s tksMs tkuss ij ;g jkf'k 13]48]704@& :i;s curh gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 11]68]920@& :i;s fnyk;s x;s gSa] bl izdkj vk; dh gkfu ds en esa vihykFkhZx.k 1]79]784@& :i;s vfrfjDr izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA tgka rd dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu dk iz'u gS] tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Magma General Insurance Co.
Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa izfrikfnr fl)kar ds vuqlkj e`rd dh iRuh] iq=&iqf=;ka rFkk ekrk&firk vFkkZr lHkh ukS 40&40 gtkj #i;s vFkkZr dqy 3]60]000@& #i;s izfrdj izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS] tcfd vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa ek= 40]000@& #i;s izfrdj jkf'k dk
[2025:RJ-JP:31580] (4 of 4) [CMA-661/2022] fu/kkZj.k bl en esa fd;k x;k gS] vr% 3]20]000@& #i;s bl en esa c<+ksrjh gksus ;ksX; gSA vU; enksa ds laca/k esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;h x;h jkf'k i;kZIr gS ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA mijksDr foospukuqlkj tks v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk tks vokMZ ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] mlds vfrfjDr nkosnkj@vihykFkhZx.k 4]99]784@&:i;s i`Fkd ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukafdr 27-10-2021 dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ jkf'k ds vfrfjDr bl vkns'k ds rgr vihykFkhZx.k 4]99]784@& :i;s rFkk ml ij v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 7 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls jkf'k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksaxsA v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /55